<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:copyright="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss" xmlns:image="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/image/">
    <channel>
        <title>Victim Complex</title>
        <link>http://www.true-equality.net/category/38.aspx</link>
        <description>Victim Complex</description>
        <language>en-GB</language>
        <copyright>ArgusEyes</copyright>
        <managingEditor>argus.eyes.youtube@googlemail.com</managingEditor>
        <generator>Subtext Version 1.9.5.177</generator>
        <item>
            <title>Does truth matter?</title>
            <link>http://www.true-equality.net/archive/2010/07/17/does-truth-matter.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;In the ongoing tradition of replies that deserve their own blog post. This one is a follow-up to the “Ada Lovelace was not the first computer programmer” thread.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;blockquote&gt;   &lt;p&gt;Emotion, to me, is my starting point; it is also an important element of the way I communicate.&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;..&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;I also think that truth is just about anything anybody else wants it to be. ‘Truth’ is a word that is available to me in sea of many other words.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt;  &lt;p&gt;This reminds me of when, discussing God with religious people, if a person says that god is a faith issue for them then there is no point arguing anymore because you have boiled it down the fundamental difference between that person’s view of the world and yours. This is similar to you and I.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Truth is subjective.. Your emotions are your guide.. That is a view I can neither understand nor condone.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Truth is not whatever we want it to be. I believe there is a standard of truth that transcends our emotions and perceptions. That is why I go through efforts to clarify what I am talking about, in this instance that the claims that Ada Lovelace was “the first programmer” are false. You don’t get to answer “yes” or “no” depending on whatever you feel you want to, there is only one answer. Whatever you want to define as a program, if you make the statement that Ada was the first to write it, then the fact that Babbage wrote it for her nullifies the idea that she was the first making the answer a “no”. Plain and simple. The question of whether Babbage was the first is separate, and “giving her the benefit of the doubt” is wishful delusion.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Living on emotions is a bad idea. Should the anti-Semite live on his or her hate? Does the racial lies they tell about Jews, which are truly believed by themselves, be the “starting point” for them? Do my protestations over the claim that that Jews slaughter non-Jews in order to use their blood for knead matzes for Passover [1] get legitimately pushed aside against claims that “emotions are my starting point” or does the truth matter?&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The world is full of untruths; these are worse than lies because they are normally believed sincerely and thus are much more dangerous, the architect of untruth is emotion. Our societies are filled with victim ideologies like feminism and blackism which keep people in enshrined in a miasma of hateful emotion about how abused they are. This enables them to rationalise the evil their abuse of others. Emotional thinking is perhaps the cause of most of the evil in the world. Lesser versions of this effect cause people to raise other people like Ada Lovelace on a pedestal, the reason is to make themselves feel better, to satiate their own self worth by raising it for another person of the same group as they are, therefore raising themselves with it. It is not something that secure people do.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Your worldview is wrong. Truth is important and it is not whatever you want it to be.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;&lt;u&gt;Sources&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;[1] &lt;a href="http://missingpeace.eu/en/articles/132-articles/11-salah-soltan-repeats-blood-libel-while-attending-a-conference-about-interfaith-and-coexistence"&gt;http://missingpeace.eu/en/articles/132-articles/11-salah-soltan-repeats-blood-libel-while-attending-a-conference-about-interfaith-and-coexistence&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.true-equality.net/aggbug/241.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>ArgusEyes</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://www.true-equality.net/archive/2010/07/17/does-truth-matter.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 05:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://www.true-equality.net/comments/241.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://www.true-equality.net/archive/2010/07/17/does-truth-matter.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.true-equality.net/comments/commentRss/241.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Princess and the Frog. Racist too, apparently</title>
            <link>http://www.true-equality.net/archive/2010/07/07/the-princess-and-the-frog.-racist-too-apparently.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;img title="the princess and the frog" alt="the princess and the frog" src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/05/29/style/31prin600.1.jpg" width="730" /&gt;   &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/31/fashion/31disney.html?_r=2&amp;amp;scp=1&amp;amp;sq=black%20princess&amp;amp;st=cse"&gt;You have got to be fucking kidding me.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;blockquote&gt;   &lt;p&gt;“THE Princess and the Frog” does not open nationwide until December, but the buzz is already breathless: For the first time in Walt Disney animation history, the fairest of them all is black.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Who cares. Judge me not by the colour of my skin yada yada yada.. I only say that, because I’m a racist though. The modern disease is to judge everything through the lens of race. yeah baby! That’s not racist thought. Paying constant attention to, and deference to race isn't in any way race-ism, do you disagree? Racist. Moving on.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;blockquote&gt;   &lt;p&gt;After viewing some photographs of merchandise tied to the movie, which is still unfinished, Black Voices, a Web site on AOL dedicated to African-American culture, faulted the prince’s relatively light skin colour. Prince Naveen hails from the fictional land of Maldonia and is voiced by a Brazilian actor; Disney says that he is not white. &lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;“Disney obviously doesn’t think a black man is worthy of the title of prince,” Angela Bronner Helm wrote March 19 on the site. “His hair and features are decidedly non-black. This has left many in the community shaking their head in befuddlement and even rage.”&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Sweet Jebus. This world is filled with insufferable jackasses and busybodies with nothing better to waste their time on (ahem). I swear. The issue is not this victim movement or that victim movement. It’s the mentality of the human victim complex and groupthink. These people are invested in a victim worldview. They are happy in being unhappy. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;blockquote&gt;   &lt;p&gt;Of course, armchair critics have also been complaining about the princess. Disney originally called her Maddy (short for Madeleine). Too much like Mammy and thus racist. A rumour surfaced on the Internet that an early script called for her to be a chambermaid to a white woman, a historically correct profession. Too much like slavery. &lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;And wait: We finally get a black princess and she spends the majority of her time on screen as a frog?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Everyone is racist, my chair is racist (actually it’s black so no way), her name is racist, the theme is racist, this is racist, that is racist, her skin isn’t “black” enough, his skin isn’t “black” enough, his hair isn’t “black” enough.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;blockquote&gt;   &lt;p&gt;“Because of Disney’s history of stereotyping,” said Michael D. Baran, a cognitive psychologist and anthropologist who teaches at Harvard and specializes in how children learn about race, “people are really excited to see how Disney will handle her language, her culture, her physical attributes.”&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Hmmm, let me peer into my crystal ball. Yep! It’ll be deemed to be racist, by a lot of really creative twists of logic that defy the imagination. And I confidently expect Disney to cringe and apologise like a puppy that has just wet the rug. &lt;a href="http://hiphopwired.com/2010/06/03/naacp-calls-hallmark-card-racist-video/"&gt;Just like Hallmark did with their “racist” card&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href="http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/53837"&gt;Maybe Disney they will pull a Capcom and alter the film somewhat&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Either way, I’ll be sitting back to watch the spiralling of society into a black hole (not black whore) of stupidity. Anyway, I’m off to brush my racist teeth and lie down in my racist bed to ponder, in amazement, the bone-crushing foolishness of the human race.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.true-equality.net/aggbug/235.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>ArgusEyes</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://www.true-equality.net/archive/2010/07/07/the-princess-and-the-frog.-racist-too-apparently.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:24:30 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://www.true-equality.net/comments/235.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://www.true-equality.net/archive/2010/07/07/the-princess-and-the-frog.-racist-too-apparently.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.true-equality.net/comments/commentRss/235.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>