Teachers with past lives.. and a particularly vicious screed

Every so-often you see a case of a teacher who is fired for some reason not relating to their conduct as a teachers. Maybe they write saucy novels in their spare time. Maybe, like Melissa Petro, they were a former sex worker.

I have two master's degrees, five years' experience in the nonprofit sector and three years' experience teaching -- and I cannot get a job. Why? Just google me. I'm the "Hooker Teacher" -- at least that's what I've come to be called ever since Sept. 27, 2010, when I found myself on the cover of the New York Post.

"Meet Melissa Petro," the story began," the teacher who gives a new twist to sex ed." The piece describes me as a "tattooed former hooker and stripper" who was "shockingly upfront about her past." Indeed, earlier that month, I'd written an Op-Ed on the Huffington Post that criticized the recent censoring of the adult services section of Craigslist and came clean about my own sex-worker past. Because I was arguing that sex workers shouldn't be ashamed to speak for themselves, I signed my name to it. The New York Post wasn't interested in my politics, however; its interest seemed only in cooking up shock that an elementary school teacher would dare admit such a shady history.

http://www.salon.com/life/sex_work/index.html?story=/mwt/feature/2011/05/04/hooker_teacher_what_i_was_thinking

Now, my opinion on this is that people are allowed to have past lives. Their qualities as a teacher should be judged on what they do in the now in the classroom. To eject people who had shady pasts who are perfectly fine teachers now (yes, that is an assumption – I have seen no criticisms of her performance as an actual teacher in all of this) is to ensure that actual humans, with experiences that can shed new perspectives on their craft, cannot become members of a certain profession.

It’s a knee-jerk reaction to try to maintain purity in certain kinds of professions. It happens in politics mainly, where any kind of event from the past can be used against political opponents. We get bland mindless barby and ken doll politicians because they couldn’t be anything but, any sign of individuality can be used to sow doubt and voters will be “just not sure”.

That aside, there is another chapter in this sordid tale I want to bring up here. A particularly vile and viscious article that has been written against Melissa Petro entitled “Idiot prosti-teacher didn't learn lesson”.

The amount of vileness in this piece is astounding. One cannot even skip past the title, which is a slanderous lie. As if a past history of being a prostitute means she is a “prosti-teacher”? Please. The first paragraph of the piece is:

This is one whore with chutzpah.

Excuse me? What did you just write there? Again, does a past define you forever? Is Melissa forever a “whore”. What kind of blatant thuggery is this piece? The amount of pejoratives as verbs and blatant bleeding of hatred into the descriptive language is enough, in my mind, to ensure in any decent world that the writer, Andrea Peyser, should never be employable as a writer again.

Melissa Petro, the stripper/hooker who was reborn a public-school teacher, thinks her Bronx art students are too dumb to understand Petro's written ravings about her career as a proud and empowered slut.

Petro floated into the National Arts Club yesterday in a virginal white mohair coat, navy-blue minidress, and brown sky-high platform do-me pumps.

she responded in a high-pitched, little-girl lisp.

"I don't think my thtudents could comprehend my work, and if they did, they deserve an A," she said condescendingly.

She'd been outed by this newspaper as a former sex worker, then charged by the school system with "conduct unbecoming a teacher." More like conduct unbecoming a human being.

The bleached-blond Petro, who lives in Manhattan, wrote a filthy and "racially insensitive" 2007 article in Post Road Magazine about stripping and whoring in Cincinnati, the investigator noted.

Melissa Petro, Happy-Hooker-turned-social-giant. Wrap her in police tape, and hide the kids.

What about the children! Hold them close to mother’s breast and whisper in their ear that everything will be alright. The irony of the second-to-last paragraph is great, glass houses Andrea, stones, avoid.

Posted on: Friday, May 13, 2011 1:14 AM
Share this post: email it, bookmark It, digg It, kick It

Comments

  1. Posted by: Pankaj on 5/22/2011 6:50 PM
    Gravatar
    Petro's mistake, as per Andrea, is probably to claim that prostitution is a legitimate service. In the minds of the gynocentric, anything that easily satisfies some part of male sexuality even for a cost, is demeaning and should never be talked about at all in "decent" circles. Funny thing, Petro is being called a "proud and empowered slut".. I thought that was "Sex and the City". Besides, to how many women living in Manhattan, does that accusation not apply to? Pretty much none, apart from the fully veiled orthodox Jews and Muslims that is.

    It is part and parcel of the Sex trade union. Note that on the other hand, these people are quite sympathetic to female teachers who have sex with their students, because they are "bipolar".

    Also, had this been a male journalist, there would be a huge uproar on his calling a woman an empowered "slut". How dare he?.. right? I have often maintained that it is not men who shame women with the term "slut", rather it is women who use it to keep "scabs" in line.

    If we could really see the truth, I bet the only difference between the "respectable" journalist at Muffington Post and Petro, is that Petro has tatoos and is far more honest about her past.

Post your comment




(this will save your form settings for the next time you comment)

Please add 7 and 8 and type the answer here:

The umbrella in particular is remembered as the symbol of the nineteenth century’s disturbing obsession with individualism. In Bellamy’s utopia, umbrellas have been replaced with retractable canopies so that everyone is protected from the rain equally.
“In the nineteenth century,” explains a character, “when it rained, the people of Boston put up three hundred thousand umbrellas over as many heads, and in the twentieth century they put up one umbrella over all the heads.”