Do you understand this?

This one’s a classic. A message sent to be by another YouTube user.

hi Mark, ich have to admit that i was not able to reach u with a better way instaed making stupid comments on ur youtube page. But beside that i did not thought that u would answer or rfelect ur own thinking in a critical way. u might think i have not watch ur vids, or tried to udnerstand what problems u might see in some societies, but thats not true. I watch it, i listen to u and i understand more than ever. Im very very sure that u blustered u so much with that topic of men vs. woman that ur not able to make a step back regard what u r actually saying.
this hole men vs woman neurotic thing is simulation in ur brain that make u believe u discovered a huge issue that must be solved. im sorry i dont see any substance at all in what ur talkin.
My favorite example is how u mentioned the plane crash in the hudson river, where u questioned the basic ritual of first women , then men. Ask urself, what does this have to do with equality?
man common dont be so cocky and noncritical to urself.
For me an intelligent human being is someone that dont need to be questioned by others, he already question hisself right from the beginning

best regards

How about I play the “how many mistakes are in each sentence” game? Hang on.. Is this message even separated into sentences?

Don’t bother to try and decipher it or respond. I’m merely going to answer back saying that unless he wants to treat me with the respect to write a proper legible message in English, then I won’t bother trying to answer him.

Posted under: Feedback, Comedy
Posted on: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 1:35 AM
« Rape is equality? What?! These are not the MRA’s you’re looking for. | Home | The classic rejoinder »
Share this post: email it, bookmark It, digg It, kick It

Comments

  1. Posted by: Phantom on 6/2/2010 4:41 PM
    Gravatar
    Allow me to translate:

    "You are wrong. 'Women and children first' is not an example of inequality or female priviledge. If you think it is, you are arrogant and stupid."

    Hardly worth the effort of reading.

  2. Posted by: ArgusEyes on 6/2/2010 10:21 PM
    Gravatar
    Oh. Well let's see if he can re-formulate and get back to me like I asked him to (in my reply). Sloppy language begets sloppy thinking. Are there likely to be any gems of wisdom in here? Seriously!

Post your comment




(this will save your form settings for the next time you comment)
Please add 7 and 4 and type the answer here:

The umbrella in particular is remembered as the symbol of the nineteenth century’s disturbing obsession with individualism. In Bellamy’s utopia, umbrellas have been replaced with retractable canopies so that everyone is protected from the rain equally.
“In the nineteenth century,” explains a character, “when it rained, the people of Boston put up three hundred thousand umbrellas over as many heads, and in the twentieth century they put up one umbrella over all the heads.”