Comments

1. Posted by: JD on 7/17/2009 4:06 AM
   
   Petty personal insults and an unfounded and negative assessment on you life. The closing is what gets me, though. Parting by making an argument and not even having the decency to support it; arguing without arguing.
   
   karlsmith00 is obviously unable to properly debate you on objective terrain so he tries to bring you down to where he feels comfortable: on the field of childish name-calling and non-sequitur statements.
2. Posted by: Porky on 7/17/2009 9:19 AM
   
   Wow, we have MORE rights than we should - what a cowpat of a man he is.
3. Posted by: AlekNovy on 7/20/2009 5:49 PM
   
   I love KarlSmith, she never ceases to stop making me laugh.
   
   I do think its a woman btw, regardless of the name.
   
   Now, you make an AWESOME point there, which is that the way to tell what someone's insecurities are, is to look at how he/she tries to insult others.
   
   If someone tries to "hurt" others by calling them ugly, then we know this person fears being "ugly" himself. Because in order to try to insult someone, you have to project from your own insecurities.
   
   
   
   A really funny case recently, was one involving MarinaIsTehSex (a really cool anti-feminist), and a feminist girl.
   
   
   After the feminist didn't like Marina's points, she proceeded to start bashing her by telling her "the only reason you support men's rights is because you can't get laid, and you think men will like you more if you support them", "you are an ugly chick who no man wants, and you can't get laid", "you've probably never had a boyfriend, that's why you hate feminists", etc... etc.
   
   Its funny seeing these catfights, where feminists who are supposedly against sexual objectification, talking about a woman's worth through the amount of sex she's had, lol.
4. Posted by: ArgusEyes on 7/21/2009 4:35 AM
   
   I think he/she is a woman too.
5. Posted by: Mith on 7/21/2009 9:54 AM
   
   -"your channel is hilarious.-
   
   Because a channel about oppression...be it reality or delusion, is just funny, am I right? That's why I spend countless hours going to feminist sites and laughing at all the things that they have issues with. Like women in middle easter countries getting stoned for being raped. Ha! I laughed so hard I had to buy myself a new keyboard. Women not able to vote? Giggles galor. Women being beaten by their abusive husbands and using their children to keep them hostage? Fun for the whole family!
   
   -another example of an ugly guy who's dissapointed[sic] with his life,-
   
   Wait, how is Argus ugly? There is nothing inheriently disgusting about Argus. He bathes, wears decent clothes, and has no physical deformity of any sort that would indicate a ugly apparence. At most he's on the hea-Ooooh, you mean because he's fat.
   
   Wow, the supposed "superiority" of women, am I right? Insulting people for their looks.
   
   Hey everyone, x person is a loser becasue he's overweight! He must be a failure!
   
   -and then he becomes a "men's rights" activist to avoid any personal responsibility for being a failure.-
   
   Yeah, just like how Marthen Luther King became a black rights activists because he didn't have a job. And that's why he's so well remembered in history; because he showed losers how to not look pathetic.
   
   Inspiring, isn't it?
   
   -you're a loser, and it's your fault.-
   
   Because I say so. So there. Feel bad about yourself. No really, this is a really crushing insult. Feel bad about your pathetic life while I don't start my sentences with capital letters. Why? Because capital letters is how men oppress women.
   
   No really, feeling bad yet? Please feel bad. It's the only way I can get off.
   
   -men have more rights, more than they should.-
   
   Seriously, when men are still allowed to breath, the world just went to hell in a basket.
   
   -but thanks for the channel, it's always good for a laugh.-
   
   Okay, fun and games are over with.
   
   The fact is ma'am, you are rather pathetic.
   
   In your entire attack, did you once challenge Argus's ideals? No. You've basically just insulted him. Congrats, you've copied the methods of a seven year old. Might I suggest that next time, you ask at least a fourteen year old on better insults?
   
   I have little idea why people find serious subjects so laughable. What, did you actually laugh at the article where a man bleeds the pains of his heart and soul of how he's been mistreated by women? Do you find it funny that children are being forced to pay child support because they were raped? Or was it the idea that men should have a right to see their kids?
   
   If this is so and I am after all, taking your word for it, you've not only insulted every man on this woman, every woman, but the very concept of humanity. You've taken the pain of people who are truly suffering and basically tossed them aside, calling it a joke and then saying that in essence, they deserve more pain. This in every aspect, shows the darkest part of humanity.
   
   You think it is alright to reduce other humans to mere laughable objects that don't matter and what's more, you claim to do so to 49% of the population. Why? And before you start on the "Argus is just a loser", you were the one whose stated that the things on Argus's channel is funny. In short, you find the misery of others amusing. You enjoy watching them suffer and even then, you think they have it too good.
   
   And of course, even after telling us how sick you are, you seem to try to demean Argus's argument by...demeaning him. And that paints a pretty dark picture of yourself. You not only enjoy the misery of others, but you enjoy inflicting it. Your low-life insults are directed at what you percieve to be insecurities on Argus's part. And what has he done? Said something general that you didn't like? He after all, didn't insult you or treat you in a similar manner, so why try so hard to demean him?
   
   The answer is of course, obvious. But of course, me being me, I won't just go out and say it. You see, I tend to get in debates at some dark, dark places of the internet and there is one fellow. Now, this fellow has a habit of attempting to batter people around with unnessicary large words and challenging people on scientific sources when he knows they're right. The reason for this is because in most cases, he lacks anything to back his argument. By using large words, he makes people who use more common words feel stupid at having to look them up or make them try to guess his exact intentions. By challenging people on scientific areas when he knows they're right, he tries to prod the person into conceding because they don't understand how it works, they just know that it does.
   
   Does this make him smart? No. It makes him a bully. He goes out of his way to make people feel worse about themselves to get what he wants. In some cases its for the purpose of winning the debate and perhaps in others just to make himself feel good.
   
   But in either case, he isn't proving that he's smart. And in a debate where someone knows his tricks, he often times comes off looking like a complete and utter ass...because he tried to trick the other person into thinking they're wrong and when it falls apart, everyone sees it.
   
   You are of a similar breed. You have no argument, so you naturally just try and make Argus look bad by attacking is physical appearence and claiming he's a loser. Why is Argus ugly? Oh he's fat. Well, he isn't really all that fat, he just looks a bit on the heavy side. Why is he a loser? Oh, because he...works on computers? Last I checked, computer experts are valued in a society that relies so heavily upon them.
   
   To anyone stupid enough to fall for your deceptions (which would be a young child), you would seem to be the one holding the cards. To anyone with any form of maturity, you look like an idiot. Because you've addressed none of his complaints, you haven't disproven anything, and you've just made yourself look bad.
   
   So tell me, why should anyone care about the opinion of an unobservant, shallow, and unintelligent individual?
6. Posted by: ArgusEyes on 7/22/2009 12:17 AM
   
   Good stuff Mith - Why not send him/her an email to his/her YouTube channel?
7. Posted by: Porky on 7/22/2009 9:30 AM
   
   Definitely a woman - i got into a protracted argument with her, started calling her "honey", she didnt skip a beat as most men would,and quickly started saying things like "you males". Ad hominems are of course a type of intellectual dishonesty so it doesn't surprise me she lies about her sex. For a moment there i thought she might actually become rational but alas...
8. Posted by: ArgusEyes on 7/22/2009 9:12 PM
   
   @Porky:
   With her introduction to me, there is no change of her being rational.
9. Posted by: anon on 7/29/2009 2:24 AM
   
   "men have more rights, more than they should."
   
   no doubt this feminist woman believes the optimum level of rights for men is none.
10. Posted by: Mith on 8/3/2009 5:31 AM
    
    Hmmmm, I just might, but I would like to bring this to your attention: http://www.vhemt.org/
    
    Am I the only one disturbed by this?
11. Posted by: ArgusEyes on 8/3/2009 3:39 PM
    
    The extinction of the human race just might be something I can get behind.
12. Posted by: Mith on 8/4/2009 4:55 AM
    
    I presume you're being a bit snarky?
13. Posted by: ArgusEyes on 8/5/2009 11:22 PM
    
    Yes. I do not support the eradication of the human race.
14. Posted by: Josie Green on 8/16/2009 2:37 PM
    
    Pathetic. What has Argus' appearance got to do with ANYTHING! However I am a little disturbed at this
    
    "That's why I spend countless hours going to feminist sites and laughing at all the things that they have issues with. Like women in middle easter countries getting stoned for being raped. Ha! I laughed so hard I had to buy myself a new keyboard. Women not able to vote? Giggles galor. Women being beaten by their abusive husbands and using their children to keep them hostage?"
    
    If that's just her making stuff up then shes even more of an idiot than she appeared. However if you really do go on pro-women websites and post abusive comments about women who have suffered rape or abuse, then you're sick, plain and simple.
    
    I'm assuming she is wrong, right?
15. Posted by: Martin on 8/27/2009 5:17 AM
    
    Sure is a feminist womin the ad hominem attack is their modus operandi...
    I know them very well! Boring...
    
    «men have more rights, more than they should»
    Feminist politic program: Men must have no right at all.
    
    
16. Posted by: malay on 3/27/2010 3:25 AM
    
    i am failure who is now in mercy attemt of his engineering life
17. Posted by: Somebody on 3/29/2011 7:50 AM
    
    Google his username and you will see a long list of hate trailing comments...
18. Posted by: jude on 5/19/2011 5:01 AM
    
    you too huh? i love her over-use of the word failure. i wonder if he or she is just trolling, because he or she comes up with no real statistical data for "its" arguments. i am having fun bashing the hell out of her with all my suedo-masculine comments. eh. love people like this. they are so easy to get power from.
19. Posted by: Jack D. Ripper on 7/6/2011 7:51 PM
    
    Dear Sir/Madam
    
    A fantastic number of blogs written by used karlsmith00 in YouTube and MANY
    other on-line forums have come to my attention. She incessantly verbally
    attacks people with aggressive feminazi and racist rants. Apart from these
    blogs, her web profile is VERY low. Nonetheless, I have gathered this information below
    
    userid: karlsmith00
    
    gender: female
    
    orientation: Lesbian
    
    Name: Kar L. Smith, Kar being a nickname.
    (I have seen people call her Kari and also Karla )
    some people thought she was a man named: "Karl Smith"
    
    age: 26 years old (maybe 27 by now)
    
    Characteristics;
    
    Hates Men. Hates Muslims. Hates non-white groups. Seems to consider (and
    hate) anyone above the age of 40 as "old". In one blog, she claimed
    to be a Lesbian feminist who wanted to enslave a russian woman to be beaten up.
    In another blog, she tells someone (userid edinburgh96) to kill their children
    and them themselves. Her blogs are endless extreme hateful skirmishes with
    men and women.
    
    Clues:
    
    She uses a number of statements which puzzles other people because they
    are often irrelevant to the blog theme, namely:
    
    "Geezer"
    
    "Take your meds"
    
    "Get a job"
    
    Also she mentions Harvard more than once. In one blog, she gave a discerning
    statement concerning the relationship between Harvard Medical school (located
    in Boston) as opposed to the Harvard Campus (located in Cambridge MA)
    
    In another blog, someone tells her:
    
    ``Don't worry about karlsmith00, she's just pissed off that garbage collection
    has been the height of her own spotty employment record‚Äö she's rallying against
    a perceived lack of career advancement stemming from the fact that males
    out-populate "garbage persons" ''
    
    ====
    
    All of this suggests very low income and sporadic employment, apparently leaving
    a lot of time for these blogs. It also suggests that she has or may be working
    in some low paying job, perhaps an orderly in some institute or hospital.
    
    -> But if that is the case, given her deranged mind, she is potentially
    dangerous. I am not saying she is necessarily a serial killer or has
    seriously harmed anyone. Perhaps these her nasty blogs is her only outlet.
    Nonetheless, I do think this case is cause for concern and authorities should
    be warned about a person like this.
    
    ==
    
    If you have any information, in particular about her whereabouts, by all means,
    please share.
    
    Thank you for your time,
    
    Best wishes
    
20. Posted by: Son Of Nova on 7/7/2011 2:19 AM
    
    hehe, I have failed at many things. There's one thing I am not, a failure. Withough getting into the obvious logical outcome of what constitutes an objective target being a failure, there merely one thing to say, personal attacks speak far, far more of the person making them than then intendended recipient. Anyone. ANYONE. Anyone who thinks ( I use the term 'think' losely) insulting people is some form of redeeming factor or some approval or their ability to be be better as a human being, is in fact a moron, who barely has the ability to comprehend they they fall under their own critical accusation.
    
    A lot of people are somewhat aware of this an knowingly use this as an effective way of emotionally harming someone (even though they have the flaw themselves). But let us not forget that it solves nothing. It is a way of avoiding argument because they are too much of a pussy to conceive otherwise, because its a radical departure from their biased thought.
    
    On the other hand. When someone has made an argument to support the suggested accusation, the accusation is no reflection on the accuser.
    
    That is logical argument. Although by far not the be all and end all. Just a kinda primer.
21. Posted by: Son Of Nova on 7/7/2011 2:24 AM
    
    Shit, thats full of typo's! Ah well, I think the point comes across.
22. Posted by: Mark on 7/7/2011 5:57 PM
    
    Indeed it did. Cheers for the comment.
23. Posted by: Jack D. Ripper on 9/18/2011 12:03 AM
    
    Something to add to the profile of karlsmith00. She claims having a college degree including a post-graduate degree. This should make her easier to trace.
    
24. Posted by: ArgusEyes on 9/25/2011 9:10 AM
    

    Something to add to the profile of karlsmith00. She claims having a college degree including a post-graduate degree. This should make her easier to trace.

    
    
    I don't support that. You shouldn't get hung up on idiots on the internet.
25. Posted by: Vinnymonster on 10/13/2011 3:03 AM
    
    I've recently had the beginnings of a run in with karlsmith00. In my opinion, she's some kind of sick and twisted monster.
    
    I wouldn't mind so much if she'd get original with the insults, but it all seems to be get a job and fat fuck.
    
    Personally, I'm finding her laughable.
26. Posted by: xxbleedingrose on 12/6/2011 7:58 PM
    
    I have made a youtube video because I saw some abusive things she had said, and I wanted to address that feminists are NOT like this, and we do NOT endorse that kind of behavior from anyone.
    We do not support harming men, we do not support replacing the patriarchy with a matriarchy, we are a movement that is for equality in the best way possible.
    Just like Christians cannot logically deny that westboro, the KKK, and the Nazi party of Germany were all Christian based, and heavily claim to be christian siting christian passages and ideals to further their cause, I cannot deny that people like this exist and likewise radicalize a normally peaceful movement for equality. It's called feminism not because we dislike men, but because women were oppressed and the fight for equality was only for women's rights, now we also include men's rights as well, but the movement has the same goal EQUALITY. Christianity doesn't value "Jesus" more than "God" they tend to value them both the same, often believing in a trinity so they would be claimed to BE the same, even if the name might suggest that one is more favored that is NOT what the movement is about.
    
    I will be helping in tracking Karla (assuming that's her real name, seems most logical given her nickname) and warning people about potential anti-male, anti-muslim, anti-white violence.
    
    Extremism is bad in ANY movement, religion, or ideology.
    Disallowing all abortions no matter if it's a 10 year old rape victim that would die without one, or one child policies similar to China's are both EQUALLY wrong, and I don't care what your position is on abortion, we can all agree that extremism in either case is HORRIBLE and WRONG, just like we can all (hopefully) agree that the KKK is bad, extremist feminists, and extremist anti-woman organizations.
    
    Please do not judge an otherwise wonderful, loving, and accepting group of people because of some loud, ignorant, troll(?) and please do not label us all the same way. In many ways, as a feminist, I promote men's rights more than women's, one example is that I advocate against sex selective genital mutilation, and the acceptable nature of male circ in the US with proposed amendments to defend the "right" of the parent, while female circ is banned, and equal protections clause should protect men and women EQUALLY not just when it helps women.
    This is ONE of many examples of how I fight FOR men.
    Just please don't think we are all the same.