Murderous boys who target girls and women

I have criticised many feminists for neglecting to mention the evils that women have committed in the past. So I feel I should say that I condemn in the strongest terms, the massacres that are primarily committed against young girls by boys in school shootings. Unlike many ideologues, I will not try to defend the actions of people in “my group” there is no group here, I am an individualist, not a victim advocate, so I must say that I wish this kid was show as soon as possible, I wish the police had shot him before he could harm a single person. But wishing does not make it so.

The most recent event is, of course, the massacre in Germany. But they go back as well, a notable example was the massacre in Nickel Mines, Pa.

"The predominant pattern in school shootings of the past three decades is that girls are the victims," says Katherine Newman, a Princeton University sociologist whose recent book examines the roots of "rampage" shootings in rural schools.

Dr. Newman has researched 21 school shootings since the 1970s. Though it's impossible to know whether girls were randomly victimized in those cases, she says, "in every case in the US since the early 1970s we do note this pattern" of girls being the majority of victims.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1004/p01s01-usgn.html

These guys are losers and scum, they are evil. There are problems that beset the sexes, men are more likely to suffer mental diseases and conditions, men are the causes of most violence. I do not wish to hide from reality behind the veil of faithful belief, reality is there to be seen by those with unburdened eyes.

Posted under: Gender Issues
Posted on: Friday, March 13, 2009 11:42 PM
« Laura Bennett says more stultifyingly stupid things | Home | A feminists response to men’s suffering: “You brought it on yourselves” »
Share this post: email it, bookmark It, digg It, kick It

Comments

  1. Posted by: Pankaj on 3/14/2009 1:48 AM
    Gravatar
    Hang on... have you heard of the Million Mom March? There are factors - almost all of them induced by the so-called "Progressive" system

    1. Imposition of gun control in schools
    2. Feminist stylized schools teaching young women that "Guns are the problem" - produces sheeple dependent on police response times for their lives.
    3. When the attack begins, it is much less dangerous to attack a female dominated area than attacking a male dominated area - because men will retaliate with whatever they can. Women will panic, run and hide and call for help.
    4. These killers know factors 1,2 and 3 and hence know that the highest body count can be acheived if they target young female populations in gun free schools.

    Of course, there are some disturbed individuals - with likely curable mental issues - but who "fall through the cracks" and commit this sort of thing. But if you ever seek mental health counselling in schools, you will know exactly why these individuals fall through the cracks - and why these are most often are young men. The sheer disregard for young boys in the system is likely to turn out one young boy among millions that seeks revenge against the hostile system. The more hostile the situation gets, the more the suppression of male voice, the more likely it is increase these revenge massacres.

    Even a loyal dog bites back if hit enough times, now if you are attacking an entire people, obviously some will pickup a gun and go crazy! Now, the targets these crazies choose are totally unfair. Quite frankly, if they had chosen the right targets, this problem will be over by now. Unfortunately, their young minds cannot identify the real targets that they ought to. Hence, public ed will continue to be dictated from high ivory towers.
  2. Posted by: Pankaj on 3/14/2009 6:32 AM
    Gravatar
    Ahh! I just went through the news article - and it seems to be exactly the case I imagined it to be. But it was not the result of neglect and failure to treat a boy with depression. It was all because of violent video games (so says the agenda pushing psych). I would call BS - if anyone did not get exactly what happened here, but everyone gets it - they simply want to pretend there was nothing wrong with the treatment of the boy.

    I fail to see the killer in the boy - seems like a regular teen.
  3. Posted by: Casshan on 3/17/2009 12:42 PM
    Gravatar
    Not so long ago I sent an email to Arguseyes about this very thing. In no way do I condone this behavior what so ever ,but it is to be expected. In a nutshell Pankaj mirrors the social science at work here: Even the most loyal dog will bite his owner after being hit one to many times, especially in cases like these when the the metaphorical dog hasn't done anything wrong to begin with beyond just being a dog.
  4. Posted by: Eric on 3/21/2009 10:13 PM
    Gravatar
    I agree with the first poster on all four accounts and the conclusion the progressive system is at lest partly to blame for girls being the victims of school shootings.

    However Pankaj misses the most important point #5. The woman - men ratio is not 50-50 in all schools to begin with. Women already thanks to the feminized school dominate higher education so all shootings on higher education schools and good schools would even if shooting was random have more girls as victims.

    Off course the opposite is true for the streets and lower classes schools, more men are uneducated and thus shootings in uneducated areas are more likely to hit boys and men and that on an incredibly high ratio compared to women victims in the same predominantly uneducated areas.

    Popularculture/Media hides this as a fact. When murder victims are mostly men in real world TV-shows like CSI always have at least 50% women as victims although a real CSI team would almost always investigate killed men, which can be easily concluded by watching a documentary TV-show. For instance the show "GANGLAND" show what everyone already know, almost every person killed is a guy.

    Also Gangland recently showed even violent gangs have picked up on feminism and chivarly. Earlier women were not allowed to be in gangs at all, nowadays they want female gang members for specific tasks. The most common task women get is after at hit or robbery she gets the guns cause the nice feminized cops dont nearly as often body-seach "pretty little girls" Also when cops bust drugdealers they often have most of the stuff not on them but its carried by a hot girl nearby, and even if the girls are caught off course the nice police and nice judges make sure the penalty is light cause she war probably forced by a big bad man to do it.

    So not only do we educated in MRA know this, uneducated street gangs are completely aware of the societys treatment of women as victims.
  5. Posted by: thestudent09 on 3/24/2009 4:06 AM
    Gravatar
    gun-free zones....creating helpless targets for mass-murdering psychopaths since 1950
  6. Posted by: ArgusEyes on 3/24/2009 9:39 PM
    Gravatar
    I agree with that.

Post your comment




(this will save your form settings for the next time you comment)

Please add 7 and 3 and type the answer here:

The umbrella in particular is remembered as the symbol of the nineteenth century’s disturbing obsession with individualism. In Bellamy’s utopia, umbrellas have been replaced with retractable canopies so that everyone is protected from the rain equally.
“In the nineteenth century,” explains a character, “when it rained, the people of Boston put up three hundred thousand umbrellas over as many heads, and in the twentieth century they put up one umbrella over all the heads.”