<< The Greener Gender: Are men worse for the environment? | Home | Greener gender video postponed for now. >>

I Was Banned From an MRA Site: A response

posted on Thursday, October 02, 2008 9:52 AM

http://punkassblog.com/2008/09/24/i-was-banned-from-an-mra-site/

This post highlights the principle problem with most blogs on the internet, we get a breakdown of the amount of time that glen mentions feminists, a disclaimer he posts on his pages and an account of a banning from some unnamed MRA blog.
Great. Mental diarrhoea straight from this persons brain to your eyes without the bother of editing in between.

But there was a slightly more pernicious message between the supercilious filler and that is exemplified by the following passage:

"I could do this all night, but I’m disinclined to. The examples are extraordinarily numerous. The point being, these are the guys that love Glenn, that feel Glenn speaks for them, that religiously read his articles and vigorously support him. What does that say about Glenn?"

I have this to say to Lisa Kansas:
To dismiss the reasoned body of work of a man who, in my experience, tries to be reasonable and fair at all times and to instead judge him by the cherry picked comments of the people who read his blog is nothing more than intellectual thuggery.

category: Gender Issues Feminism

Comments


# re: I Was Banned From an MRA Site: A response
Posted by John Dias on 10/3/2008 6:25 AM
Gravatar There was one person -- ostensibly a female because her username was "girl," who indeed was banned recently on AntiMisandry.com. She posted some incredibly bigoted things against men, and was quickly dispatched. Maybe that was Lisa.
# re: I Was Banned From an MRA Site: A response
Posted by ArgusEyes on 10/3/2008 7:58 PM
Gravatar Could be, I was banned from feministing in a heartbeat.
Post Comment
Title *
Name *
Email
Url
Comment *  
Please add 8 and 5 and type the answer here:

The path to true gender equality

What is equality? We in the men’s rights movement believe in equality of opportunity, that as long as the playing field is level then the outcomes should not matter. The feminists tend to believe that equality of outcome is what matters, that the columns under men and women must match for there to be no more sexism. So what really matters at the end of the day is what you are comparing. Rights or outcomes? This is the foundation of our debate.