True Equality

Guardians of the unborn

It is undoubtedly fascistic and totalitarian, yet I am surprised that a country like the Netherlands would consider such a proposition that actually inhibits women! Men sure - I'm used to seeing articles proposing things that are just a few hairs short of imprisoning all men out of the womb but one rarely sees such propositions against women.

This bit got me:

"I must admit that it shocked me that this law was the brainchild of a socialist. As a confounded psychiatrist friend who deals with troubled children put it, this bill is vaguely reminiscent of the eugenics and sterilisation programmes of the fascist era.

Really? When I saw it was a socialist who proposed this I thought "ah.. that explains it". I think Mr. Khaled Diab needs a little education on what socialism actually is. It is not always bad to be sure. After all, an amount of social programs and institutions help keep society civilised.

However, let’s take the example of the fascists. The Nazi party were undoubtedly socialists "Nazi" is short for their full name which is "National Socialist German Workers' Party" (you need to say it in German to see the link in the pronunciation). They were socialists, it is there in the title, it is undebatable.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/11/081112160915.htm

ScienceDaily (Nov. 11, 2008) — A radical overhaul of sperm donation services is needed to address the critical shortage of sperm donors in the UK, say two fertility experts in an editorial on bmj.com today.

...

They believe that the removal of donor anonymity in 2005 may have contributed to the current shortage of donors.

...

The authors say increasing the number of families that can be created from a single donor should be considered. To prevent siblings born from donation later inadvertently having children together, UK law limits the number of families that can be created from any one donor to 10. But Hamilton and Pacey argue that this figure is arbitrary and not evidence based, and a more flexible approach is needed.

They point out that the size of the UK population is enough for a large safety margin to already exist. Interestingly, in the Netherlands, which has a smaller population than the UK, the upper limit is 25 offspring per donor, while in France it is five.

Basically remove anonymousness and reduce how many times donations can be made and you get a shortage. Wow, bureaucracy and government interference certainly helped women there didn’t it? I’m sure that Feminists will be lining up to blame men for this. How dare they be selfish enough to not put down their personal details so that they can get whacked for 10 sets of child support down the line when the next set of anti-male legislation gets passed?

Maybe some sort of personal video is in order?

It's actually 501 now so I'd better get on that.. The 500th subscriber was AmbientMusicII.

This is a talk given my Dr. Warren Farrel at the Cato (www.cato.org) institute on Tuesday, February 1, 2005 entitled:

Why Men Earn More
The Startling Truth Behind the Pay Gapand What Women Can Do About It

A presentation from his book of the same name
http://www.amazon.com/Why-Men-Earn-More-Startling/dp/0814472109/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1226349227&sr=1-1

I have reproduced this material without permission under fair use. The aim is to present information on how womens own choices lead to the wage gap which thus stems from their own liberty. I make no profit from these video views and all intellectual material is to Cato.

Synopsis:
Warren Farrell, the only man to have been elected three times to the National Organization for Womens New York board of directors, is the author of such books as The Myth of Male Power and Why Men Are the Way They Are. In his new book, he argues that women earn less than men on average not because they are discriminated against, but because they have made lifestyle choices that affect their ability to earn. Why Men Earn More argues that although discrimination sometimes plays a part, both men and women unconsciously make trade-offs that affect how much they earn. Farrell clearly defines the 25 different workplace choices that affect incomes--including putting in more hours at work, taking riskier jobs or more hazardous assignments, being willing to change location, and training for technical jobs that involve less people contact--and provides readers with specific, research-supported ways for women to earn higher pay.

Obama win does not end racism, activists say: http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE4A4B8820081106?feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews

Please consider the momentous unwisdom of this statement "Obama win does not end racism". I think the only thing that will erase racism is the destruction of the human race.

A black president means nothing to the victim mongering race baiter. We have feminists and P.C. madness here in the U.K. but we have had a female prime minster. It ultimately means nothing to the politically correct.